🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a bill raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, support built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Apart from the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.